Data study · October 2026

Rhode Island Fall Yard Work Index: All 39 Cities and Towns Ranked (2026)

Foster, Glocester and West Greenwich top the list. Analysis by My Green Robot using U.S. Census and USDA Forest Service data.

Published · Data retrieved

My Green Robot mascot

Top 10

In which Rhode Island towns does a typical home face the most fall yard work (leaves to clear, a yard of its own to look after, room to cover)? The index measures intensity per home, not total volume, so small towns can rank high. Coventry and Hopkinton tie at 10th.

RankTownIndex (0–100)Tree canopy over developed landOwner-occupied single-family detached shareLand acres per housing unitOwner-occupied detached homes (± MOE)
1Foster99.050.7%91.3%20.571,373 (±125)
2Glocester90.048.0%82.0%8.063,174 (±227)
3West Greenwich89.541.6%83.2%12.272,092 (±219)
4Scituate86.345.1%81.5%7.003,427 (±399)
5Exeter85.843.0%73.4%14.541,774 (±282)
6Richmond82.136.6%84.2%8.032,522 (±192)
7Jamestown77.436.6%85.1%1.952,128 (±153)
8Barrington75.837.7%86.8%0.815,407 (±284)
9Charlestown73.735.5%83.1%4.292,903 (±219)
10Coventry73.239.0%73.0%2.4510,587 (±498)
10Hopkinton73.236.3%73.2%7.412,501 (±223)

Volume view

Count of owner-occupied single-family detached homes, ACS 2020–2024, ±90% MOE: Warwick 23,419 (±719), Cranston 19,125 (±721), Providence 16,668 (±1,114), Coventry 10,587 (±498), East Providence 10,503 (±524), Pawtucket 10,004 (±629). Pawtucket ranks 37th of 39 on the index but has about 10,000 owner-occupied detached homes, among the most of any RI municipality (6th by point estimate; MOE overlaps 4th–5th).

Full table: all 39 cities and towns

RankTownIndexCanopy, developed land %Canopy, all land %Owner-occ. detached share %Land acres / housing unitOwner-occ. detached homes (±MOE)Rank by countOccupied unitsHousing unitsLand sq miMedian year built
1Foster town99.050.774.591.320.571,373 (±125)371,5031,57950.81975
2Glocester town90.048.073.082.08.063,174 (±227)283,8734,30654.21975
3West Greenwich town89.541.671.983.212.272,092 (±219)342,5142,62450.31991
4Scituate town86.345.171.681.57.003,427 (±399)254,2044,40148.11966
5Exeter town85.843.070.673.414.541,774 (±282)352,4162,52857.51987
6Richmond town82.136.660.084.28.032,522 (±192)302,9973,21440.31985
7Jamestown town77.436.647.585.11.952,128 (±153)332,5003,1039.41975
8Barrington town75.837.740.286.80.815,407 (±284)146,2286,4988.21956
9Charlestown town73.735.564.683.14.292,903 (±219)293,4935,45836.51980
10Coventry town73.239.065.873.02.4510,587 (±498)414,50515,43059.11973
10Hopkinton town73.236.366.373.27.412,501 (±223)323,4163,71543.01977
12Burrillville town72.638.570.568.65.544,158 (±403)216,0586,34454.91970
12East Greenwich town72.641.559.973.11.843,950 (±252)235,4045,69016.41976
14Little Compton town69.026.244.893.35.621,452 (±112)361,5572,34020.61969
15North Smithfield town62.636.860.365.82.923,302 (±291)275,0155,24023.91972
16South Kingstown town61.635.558.068.12.587,736 (±457)911,36013,99356.41978
17Cumberland town56.336.356.968.01.149,718 (±498)714,29714,91826.51972
18Smithfield town53.734.657.766.72.045,295 (±418)157,9348,22026.21976
19Tiverton town52.631.454.966.22.384,632 (±360)206,9957,83129.11972
20Johnston town51.629.548.470.61.228,245 (±597)811,67512,32823.51968
21North Kingstown town48.931.154.365.32.197,640 (±395)1011,69412,64143.21973
22New Shoreham town46.311.527.674.02.92305 (±80)394121,9899.11972
23Lincoln town43.735.252.958.11.285,110 (±442)168,7959,00618.11970
24Portsmouth town41.625.137.767.21.715,064 (±398)177,5418,61223.01973
25Narragansett town38.429.142.564.60.914,045 (±321)226,2639,75713.91975
26Westerly town36.827.247.963.91.446,704 (±393)1210,49813,09029.51973
27Warwick city35.327.934.465.00.6023,419 (±719)136,05537,51635.01961
28Bristol town34.729.739.555.30.664,828 (±394)188,7319,5109.81964
29Warren town25.825.632.048.90.702,517 (±235)315,1455,6076.21950
30Cranston city25.324.636.658.70.5419,125 (±721)232,59533,83428.41958
31West Warwick town23.729.036.943.20.336,211 (±553)1314,36115,2697.81968
32Middletown town20.020.222.947.30.993,415 (±339)267,2268,22512.71969
33East Providence city18.419.827.750.40.3910,503 (±524)520,83621,92113.31958
33North Providence town18.424.727.448.00.237,212 (±570)1115,02915,5555.61970
35Newport city11.619.121.734.60.363,825 (±408)2411,04913,5527.71938
35Woonsocket city11.623.431.226.40.264,652 (±470)1917,61819,4297.81952
37Pawtucket city6.311.715.432.70.1710,004 (±629)630,59832,8108.71947
38Providence city4.713.515.023.30.1516,668 (±1,114)371,49779,42318.41938
39Central Falls city0.08.711.38.30.09641 (±267)387,6838,4261.21944

On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column. The town name stays in view.

Canopy columns: % mean NLCD tree canopy. Shares and acres computed by My Green Robot from the sources below. MOE = ACS 90% margin of error. Equal index values share a rank.

Download the full data (CSV)All 39 towns, with each metric, its score and the source counts.

Methodology

Question: In which Rhode Island towns does a typical home face the most fall yard work (leaves to clear, a yard of its own to look after, room to cover)?

The index measures intensity per home, not total volume, so small towns can rank high. A separate column gives the number of owner-occupied single-family detached homes (volume).

1. Tree canopy over developed land (%)

Weight 40%
What it stands for
Leaves falling where people live
Definition
Mean NLCD 2021 tree canopy cover (0–100%) over 30 m pixels inside the town that NLCD 2021 Land Cover classifies as Developed (classes 21, 22, 23, 24)
Source
USFS/MRLC NLCD Tree Canopy Cover CONUS 2021 v2021-4 + MRLC NLCD 2021 Land Cover L48

2. Owner-occupied single-family detached share (%)

Weight 40%
What it stands for
Homeowners responsible for their own yard
Definition
ACS B25032_003 (owner-occupied, 1-unit detached) ÷ B25032_001 (all occupied housing units)
Source
US Census Bureau, ACS 2020–2024 5-year, table B25032

3. Land acres per housing unit

Weight 20%
What it stands for
Room for yards (lower housing density)
Definition
Census land area (TIGER ALAND, m² → acres) ÷ ACS B25001_001 (total housing units)
Source
TIGER/Line 2024 county subdivisions + ACS 2020–2024 5-year B25001

Normalization: each metric is converted to a percentile rank among the 39 towns (lowest = 0, highest = 100; ties share the average rank). Index = 0.40 × canopy score + 0.40 × detached-owner score + 0.20 × land-per-unit score (0–100). Towns are ranked by the index; equal index values share a rank (Coventry and Hopkinton tie at 10th).

Why percentile ranks: land per housing unit is highly skewed (Foster 20.6 acres vs Central Falls 0.09), and min–max scaling would let one value dominate. Ranks are easy to explain and robust to that.

Geography: the 39 RI municipalities = Census county subdivisions (TIGER/Line 2024 + ACS summary level 060). The water-only "County subdivisions not defined" record is dropped. Canopy is computed inside TIGER boundaries; open-water pixels (NLCD class 11) and canopy codes 254/255 (non-processing/background) are excluded.

Context only (not scored): ACS B25035 median year structure built is kept in the full table.

Limits

  • This is an index, not a measurement of hours or tons of leaves. It combines three proxies; the weights (40/40/20) are an editorial choice. Different weights would reorder some towns.
  • Canopy year: NLCD Tree Canopy 2021 is the newest CONUS year listed on the MRLC WCS download service (GetCapabilities checked 2026-10-21); a newer release may exist elsewhere. It is modeled from satellite imagery (30 m), not a street-tree inventory; the NLCD version also smooths small year-to-year changes. "Developed" includes roads and commercial land, not only yards.
  • ACS figures are 5-year survey estimates (2020–2024) with margins of error (90% level), which are large for small towns (e.g., New Shoreham 305 ± 80 owner-occupied detached homes). Shares are not tested for statistically significant differences; neighbouring ranks may not differ meaningfully. Count ranks (e.g., Coventry, East Providence and Pawtucket at ~10,000–10,600) overlap within MOE.
  • Land acres per housing unit includes forest, farms, parks and commercial land, so it overstates yard size in rural towns. It is a density proxy, not lot size.
  • Housing counts come from ACS occupied/total units; seasonal homes (e.g., New Shoreham, Charlestown, Narragansett) are in B25001 but not in the occupied totals.

Data gaps: metrics wanted but dropped

  • Lot size per town: no public, per-town single-family lot-size dataset found. The statewide RIDEM Tax Parcels layer (risegis.ri.gov) has parcel acres and town code but no land-use field to isolate single-family lots; third-party parcel sites (LandBrief, CountyOffice) are not primary sources and don't cover all 39 towns. Dropped; replaced only by the density proxy above, labeled as such.
  • Town leaf-collection schedules: not standardized or machine-readable across 39 towns. Dropped.
  • Snowfall / first-frost dates by town: no per-town official series retrieved (NOAA normals are per weather station, not per town). Dropped.
  • Newer canopy (2022+): not on the MRLC WCS as of retrieval. Used 2021.
  • Census API (api.census.gov) required a key; the same ACS tables were taken from the Census Bureau's official table-based summary files instead (identical estimates).

Sources

All retrieved 2026-10-21 (ET).

  1. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-Year Estimates, table-based summary file
  2. U.S. Census Bureau, TIGER/Line Shapefiles 2024, County Subdivisions, Rhode Island (boundaries; ALAND/AWATER)
  3. USDA Forest Service / MRLC, NLCD Tree Canopy Cover CONUS 2021 (v2021-4), clipped via MRLC WCS (coverage mrlc_download__nlcd_tcc_conus_2021_v2021-4, EPSG:5070, X 1968000–2044000, Y 2268000–2375000)
  4. MRLC, NLCD 2021 Land Cover (L48), same clip (coverage mrlc_download__NLCD_2021_Land_Cover_L48), used to keep Developed classes 21–24 and drop open water (11)
  5. Checked for lot size (not used): RIDEM Tax Parcels service fields
  6. Format inspiration only (no data used): LawnStarter studies

How to cite

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2020–2024 5-year estimates (tables B25032, B25001); U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line 2024; USDA Forest Service / MRLC NLCD Tree Canopy Cover 2021 and NLCD 2021 Land Cover. Analysis by My Green Robot.

Questions or press: Rafael Escobar, Founder, My Green Robot, jobs@mygreenrobot.com.

My Green Robot mascot

Tell My Green Robot your yard job and our AI robot phones and emails local RI lawn care pros for quotes. No phone tag. Try it free. No credit card needed.

Try it free